Ladies Who Lunch

E. Jean Carroll vs. Trump: Challenging Presidential Immunity

E Jean Carroll
In 2019, journalist E. Jean Carroll accused Donald Trump of raping her in the 1990s. Trump denied this, but a court allowed her defamation lawsuit to proceed, challenging presidential immunity.

In 2019, journalist E. Jean Carroll accused Donald Trump of raping her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the 1990s. Trump denied the allegations, calling Carroll a liar and claiming he never met her. In November 2020, the Department of Justice, under Attorney General William Barr, attempted to intervene, arguing Trump acted in his capacity as president and should be immune. Carroll’s defamation case challenged this immunity and drew significant attention.

The case took an interesting turn in November 2020 when the US Department of Justice, then led by Trump’s attorney general, William Barr, attempted to intervene and take over the case, arguing that Trump was acting in his official capacity as president when he denied Carroll’s allegations and therefore should be immune from the lawsuit.

However, in October 2021, a federal appeals court in Manhattan rejected the DOJ’s bid, allowing Carroll’s case to proceed in court. The court ruled that Trump was not acting within the scope of his employment as president when he made the alleged defamatory statements, and thus could be held liable for any damages resulting from them.

Carroll’s case is a civil lawsuit seeking monetary damages and does not involve criminal charges. It is important to note that Carroll’s allegations against Trump fall outside the statute of limitations for criminal rape charges in New York, which is five years.

Carroll’s case is significant because it challenges the notion that the president of the United States is above the law and cannot be held accountable for his actions. It also brings attention to the issue of sexual assault and rape, particularly when it comes to powerful men and their abuse of power.

Carroll’s case also sheds light on the difficulties and stigmas that survivors of sexual assault face when coming forward with their stories. Many people are quick to dismiss survivors as liars or attention-seekers, which only perpetuates a culture of silence and shame surrounding sexual assault.

In the end, Carroll’s case serves as a reminder that rape and sexual assault are serious crimes and that no one is above the law, no matter how powerful they may be.

Subscribe

Sign-up to receive new articles and other content to your inbox, every week.

Ladies Who Lunch is an empowering online community celebrating women. Join us for diverse discussions on a wide variety of table topics.

Ladies Who Lunch, Inc.
217 E70th St #1236
New York, NY 10021

SOCIAL MEDIA

Follow us on social media

Tag us (@ladieswholunch)
or use the hashtag
#ladieswholunch to be featured

BECOME A CONTRIBUTOR

Welcome to Ladies Who Lunch.

If you are a contributor, please enter your email to sign in.

By continuing, you agree to the updated Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.